In the first part of the article, we discussed how suffering was replaced by the realization of purpose in the form of service. The next stage, or the new mission of the soul incarnating on Earth, is exploration.
If you are looking for an answer to the question of what your purpose is, you will find it in this article. Read on to learn what the researcher’s approach entails.
A New Perspective on Service
There are many specialists in helping professions who are, in one way or another, involved in working with people (psychologists, healers, tarot readers, etc.).
This also includes everyone who interacts with people in their profession (e.g., managers, salespeople, etc.).
The service contracts mentioned above are no longer needed. For this reason, there is currently a massive retraining taking place.
It manifests in the fact that people can no longer go against themselves, adapt to the demands of the audience, but want to broadcast who they want to be or who they are right now.
This is a phenomenon of a kind of revelation that is taking on massive proportions.
The service contract, where you help others get rid of their pain and therefore you don’t feel pain, is closed.
Old service contracts can be rewritten. Everyone has come to realize this now.
It is for this reason that there are now so many specialists who are ready to literally shut down all their activities, not knowing where to go next or how to live.
These people are tired of digging into the suffering of others. Saving a drowning person is the job of the drowning person themselves. There is no point in digging through someone else’s mess.
See also The Return of Sovereignty, or How We Become Invisible to People of the 3D World
The Researcher’s Approach
And what about instead of service contracts? Here, a tool called the researcher approach comes into play.
Everything with me is transparent and clear. I have never studied anywhere, I have no teachers, and I do not possess any methodologies. I give exactly this answer to everyone interested, starting from 2010, when I went online. None of this exists. I simply never wondered why it doesn’t exist.
I have a general understanding of why it turned out this way. I sort through everything, take any tool, and within a minute it looks different to me (that is, I transform it to suit myself).
If, for example, I did not write down certain phrases from Jason Estis, I would not be able to voice a single phrase from his information to my audience because, over time, it would have already transformed into something completely different. This is my gift – I integrate many things instantly.
And here, the focus is very important – what you take, what you let into yourself. At the same time, most of what is unnecessary for the moment is automatically filtered out. I am capable of processing cumbersome theories – merely to extract a small grain of truth from them.
But I have never explored the deeper reason why it turned out this way. And Jason Estis formulated it well: “instead of being obligated and doing what your mission supposedly requires, you begin to explore, study, invent, create.” There is no way around this.
See also: The concept of leadership as the embodiment of your Divine mission
How you close the path of research for yourself
When you adopt someone else’s system, there are always built-in limitations.
A good example is everything related to yoga schools, particularly visits from Indian gurus. Yes, a person who chooses this is transformed, their consciousness changes.
But it turns out that on one hand, an insignificant and small person follows a great and grand teacher, whom they try to grow to match.
And on the other hand, there are many frameworks and limitations that the guru themselves transmits.
And if in the world of duality such an approach was enormously helpful, then as soon as you move up a level, it stops working.
The project’s audience periodically asks: what to do – the tool is not working for some reason.
Tools stop working because they are someone else’s tools.
For this reason, I get tired of answering the frequent question “but how do I use this tool.”
Not only did I invent the tool. For example, I create a meditation. I have a specific intention, and everything unfolds according to it. And then the questions begin: what if I exhaled wrong, what if I turned the wrong way, what if I fell asleep. And off it goes – from the mind.
All of this happens because of inner doubts. It is very simple. There is a tool, take it and do it. If you don’t like it, rework it for yourself or take another one.
In the course “Dance with the Shadow,” there is a meditation called “The Bus.” The framework of the meditation is that during it, you are on a bus. But over all the years of the course, for some it turns out to be an airplane, for some a helicopter, for some a train.
In one part of the meditation, you need to descend from the heart downwards. Recently, a course participant stated that this gives her a feeling of claustrophobia. Who is stopping you from going upwards instead of descending?
Are you afraid of caves? – create a huge space on top of a mountain where you feel great. Why don’t you do that? Do you need someone’s permission to come up with a version of the tool that is comfortable for you?
Please note, these are the frames you are sitting in. By doing so, you are closing off exploration for yourself.
In this sense, tools with very vague wording are good. For example, “that which serves your highest good.”
You may not know what that good is. But it is embedded in the intention (of the tool) and serves your highest good. This approach requires the ability to trust.
You trust and blindly go where your heart leads you. And this alone is enough for a tremendous turnaround. This is cooler than sitting around, asking a bunch of questions, and not moving anywhere.
The more precision and clarity you need to take a step, the more you sit in your mind, and the greater the barrier that blocks your exit into the space of the heart.
See also How to choose tools for self-knowledge and what are the approaches to using them
The researcher’s approach using scientists as an example
Let’s consider exploration using scientists as an example.
Before doing anything, scientists formulate a hypothesis – maybe it’s this, maybe it’s that, or maybe it’s something else entirely. Then scientists begin to test their hypotheses.
It may turn out that all three hypotheses work. Or it may turn out that none work, or one works and the others do not.
Note that a hypothesis that does not work is not perceived as a mistake. There is simply a hypothesis, and you are testing it.
At the same time, you get a kick out of the process of exploration itself because, in the end, you will know whether it works or not.
If you are sitting in your mind, apply this principle to yourself.
As a rule, life turns out differently. You want things to be a certain way, this way and that way (for your husband to change, for this to be done, for the children to be a certain way, etc.). As a result, you don’t see all the other options that the Universe has prepared for you.
Because you are rigidly fixated on specific things (options) and you don’t accept or allow for others.
Moreover, you are afraid of making a mistake. So you sit and choose where, by definition, there is no choice. For you, making a mistake is a failure, another failing grade.
See also: What is the mission of the soul and what feelings devalue the gift of your soul
The Myth of Purpose
To break out of this vicious circle, your first step is to get rid of “I must”.
Start focusing on what is convenient and comfortable for you and brings you joy.
This shift is especially important for those who are “rescuers” and work with other people. You no longer owe anything to anyone.
If you are still searching for your purpose/mission, you can keep knocking on closed gates.
Neither mission nor purpose exists in principle. There is simply the Path. There is the path you have planned.
My example. I was a teacher at school. I was a tutor for children. I was a teacher teaching courses and trainings. As a teacher, I ventured into marketing and social networks.
If everything were taken away from me, I would still be teaching. This is the path I walk. And it doesn’t matter what you are teaching. The main thing is to transmit your truth. In what form you transmit it, in what field, doesn’t matter.
Nowadays, with the emergence of trendy and well-paid internet professions, many people want to immediately do something that will instantly bring in money.
At the same time, people don’t even think about whether this is their path, whether they are even drawn in that direction.
«If you are meant to help people, they will come to you for help. If they don’t come to you, help yourself.»
Jason Estes
By practicing this approach, you can instantly dispel your savior complex.
Ask yourself every time: “Was I asked for help? If not, why am I getting involved?”
Most people interpret purpose as a single endeavor in which a person can succeed.
A common opinion is “I’m not successful in life because I haven’t found my calling,” “I don’t even know what I want to do.” If this is your case, look inside yourself.
First, find yourself. Stop living in blinders and illusions.
Find out what makes your soul sing, what motivates you to wake up in the morning, what makes you laugh sincerely. It is in these moments that the grain of truth you are seeking lies.
If you listen to what people come to you with, the answer is always there.
Remember what people have recently approached you with—what questions, what suggestions. The universe always responds to a request.
Eternal searching in your head initially means: “I am flawed, inadequate. Everyone knows their purpose, their global mission, but I—a fool—do not.”
The universe answers you: “If you consider yourself a fool and others more advanced, more developed, that is your choice.”
See also: Is it worth seeking your purpose and how to see new opportunities for realization
What mission are you currently pursuing? The mission of service, or have you already transitioned to the researcher approach? Or perhaps you combine both?
The article is based on a broadcast from the #conversation_on_the_couch section “Mission: Impossible”